4.7 Article

Targeted memory reactivation in REM but not SWS selectively reduces arousal responses

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-01854-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BBSRC [BB/J014478/1]
  2. ERC grant [618607]
  3. BBSRC [BB/J014478/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research suggests that targeted memory reactivation during sleep, especially in REM stage, can help decrease subjective arousal responses associated with emotional memories. This supports the idea that emotional memory reactivation during REM sleep underlies sleep-dependent habituation.
A growing body of evidence suggests that sleep can help to decouple the memory of emotional experiences from their associated affective charge. This process is thought to rely on the spontaneous reactivation of emotional memories during sleep, though it is still unclear which sleep stage is optimal for such reactivation. We examined this question by explicitly manipulating memory reactivation in both rapid-eye movement sleep (REM) and slow-wave sleep (SWS) using targeted memory reactivation (TMR) and testing the impact of this manipulation on habituation of subjective arousal responses across a night. Our results show that TMR during REM, but not SWS significantly decreased subjective arousal, and this effect is driven by the more negative stimuli. These results support one aspect of the sleep to forget, sleep to remember (SFSR) hypothesis which proposes that emotional memory reactivation during REM sleep underlies sleep-dependent habituation. Hutchison et al. played sounds, which were paired with either emotionally negative or neutral images, to participants during either REM or slow-wave stages of sleep. They demonstrated that such targeted memory reactivation during REM sleep, but not slow-wave sleep, significantly decreased arousal. This provides key information about memory consolidation/loss during sleep.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available