4.6 Article

Cytokine Level Changes in Schizophrenia Patients with and without Metabolic Syndrome Treated with Atypical Antipsychotics

Journal

PHARMACEUTICALS
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph14050446

Keywords

schizophrenia; atypical antipsychotics; cytokine; metabolic syndrome

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [18-15-00011]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [18-15-00011] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the changes in cytokine levels in schizophrenia patients receiving atypical antipsychotics with or without metabolic syndrome. The results showed that treatment with atypical antipsychotics had different effects on inflammatory cytokine levels depending on the presence of MetS. Patients with MetS experienced increased levels of certain cytokines, while those without MetS had decreased levels of other cytokines after treatment.
The present study aims at comparing the change in cytokine levels in schizophrenia patients treated with atypical antipsychotics, with or without metabolic syndrome (MetS). The study included 101 patients with schizophrenia, 38 with and 63 without MetS, who received risperidone, quetiapine, olanzapine or aripiprazole for six weeks. We analyzed the concentration of 21 cytokines in the serum patients. The treatment with atypical antipsychotics changed some proinflammatory cytokine levels. It led to increased IFN-alpha 2 (p = 0.010), IL-1 alpha (p = 0.024) and IL-7 (p = 0.017) levels in patients with MetS, whereas the same treatment led to decreased levels of IFN-gamma (p = 0.011), IL-1 beta (p = 0.035), IL-12p40 (p = 0.011), IL-17A (p = 0.031), IL-6 (p = 0.043) and TNF-alpha (p = 0.012) in individuals without MetS. Our results demonstrated the effects of atypical antipsychotics on the immune-inflammatory parameters, depending on the metabolic disturbances in schizophrenia patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available