4.6 Article

New Acyl Derivatives of 3-Aminofurazanes and Their Antiplasmodial Activities

Journal

PHARMACEUTICALS
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph14050412

Keywords

antimalarial; furazan derivatives; Plasmodium falciparum; PAMPA

Funding

  1. University of Graz

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The N-acylated furazan-3-amine derivative showed promising antiplasmodial activity against different strains of Plasmodium falciparum, with benzamides being the most active. The substitution pattern of the phenyl ring affected the activity, while the N-(4-(3,4-diethoxyphenyl)-1,2,5-oxadiazol-3-yl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide exhibited good physicochemical properties and high antiplasmodial activity against both chloroquine-sensitive and multiresistant strains.
An N-acylated furazan-3-amine of a Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) project has shown activity against different strains of Plasmodium falciparum. Seventeen new derivatives were prepared and tested in vitro for their activities against blood stages of two strains of Plasmodium falciparum. Several structure-activity relationships were revealed. The activity strongly depended on the nature of the acyl moiety. Only benzamides showed promising activity. The substitution pattern of their phenyl ring affected the activity and the cytotoxicity of compounds. In addition, physicochemical parameters were calculated (log P, log D, ligand efficiency) or determined experimentally (permeability) via a PAMPA. The N-(4-(3,4-diethoxyphenyl)-1,2,5-oxadiazol-3-yl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide possessed good physicochemical properties and showed high antiplasmodial activity against a chloroquine-sensitive strain (IC50(NF54) = 0.019 mu M) and even higher antiplasmodial activity against a multiresistant strain (IC50(K-1) = 0.007 mu M). Compared to the MMV compound, the permeability and the activity against the multiresistant strain were improved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available