4.6 Article

Annual risk of tuberculosis infection in rural China: a population-based prospective study

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 168-178

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00235-2016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2013ZX10003004-002, 2014ZX10003001-001]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team at the University of China [IRT13007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prospective population data on the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) infection has been sparsely reported in the global literature. A population-based prospective study was conducted in rural China to investigate the annual risk of TB infection, and its persistence using serial tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and an interferon-gamma release assay. In total, 13 580 eligible participants from four rural sites, identified as TST negative (< 10 mm) or QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT) (an interferon-gamma release assay) negative from a baseline survey, were included in the first year's follow-up examination. The annual conversion rate of QFT among the study sites ranged between 2.1% and 4.9% (average 3.1%), and the incidence of TST conversion ranged between 6.0% and 31.1% (average 14.5%). During the second year's follow-up, infection persistence was investigated using 390 subjects with QFT conversions. Among them, 49.7% (164 out of 330) were found to be consistently QFT positive. Both the conversion and the persistence of QFT positivity were found to be significantly increased with increasing age. In conclusion, the annual TB infection rate was suggested to be similar to 1.5% based on persistent positive results after QFT conversion in rural China. Therefore, infection control among those high-risk populations, including the elderly, should be prioritised for TB control in China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available