4.7 Article

Latent Profile Analysis of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Cognitive Function of Adults 2 Weeks After Traumatic Brain Injury Findings From the TRACK-TBI Study

Journal

JAMA NETWORK OPEN
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3467

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [U01 NS1365885]
  2. NINDS [R01 NS110856]
  3. US Department of Defense TBI Endpoints Development (TED) Initiative [W81XWH-14-2-0176]
  4. NINDS under the National Institutes of Health [L30NS113158-01]
  5. One Mind
  6. Neurotrauma Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified four distinct neurobehavioral phenotypes in patients with TBI two weeks after injury, which significantly improved estimation of association with 6-month outcomes when added to demographic characteristics and other injury characteristics in models. These distinct phenotypes may assist in clinical decision-making and patient selection for clinical trials.
IMPORTANCE Heterogeneity across patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents challenges for clinical care and intervention design. Identifying distinct clinical phenotypes of TBI soon after injury may inform patient selection for precision medicine clinical trials. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether distinct neurobehavioral phenotypes can be identified 2 weeks after TBI and to characterize the degree to which early neurobehavioral phenotypes are associated with 6-month outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective cohort study included patients presenting to 18 US level 1 trauma centers within 24 hours of TBI from 2014 to 2019 as part of the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study. Data were analyzed from January 28, 2020, to January 11, 2021. EXPOSURES TBI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Latent profiles (LPs) were derived from common dimensions of neurobehavioral functioning at 2 weeks after injury, assessed through National Institutes of Health TBI Common Data Elements (ie, Brief Symptom Inventory-18, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Depression checklist, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5, PROMIS Pain Intensity scale, Insomnia Severity Index, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition Coding and Symbol Search subtests, Trail Making Test, and NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery Pattern Comparison Processing Speed, Dimensional Change Card Sort, Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention, and Picture Sequence Memory subtests). Six-month outcomes were the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale (QOLIBRI-OS), Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE), and Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ). RESULTS Among 1757 patients with TBI included, 1184 (67.4%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 39.9 (17.0) years. LP analysis revealed 4 distinct neurobehavioral phenotypes at 2 weeks after injury: emotionally resilient (419 individuals [23.8%]), cognitively impaired (368 individuals [20.9%]), cognitively resilient (620 individuals [35.3%]), and neuropsychiatrically distressed (with cognitive weaknesses; 350 individuals [19.9%]). Adding LP group to models including demographic characteristics, medical history, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and other injury characteristics was associated with significantly improved estimation of association with 6-month outcome (GOSE R-2 increase = 0.09-0.19; SWLS R-2 increase = 0.12-0.22; QOLIBRI-OS R-2 increase = 0.14-0.32; RPQ R-2 = 0.13-0.34). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of patients with TBI presenting to US level-1 trauma centers, qualitatively distinct profiles of symptoms and cognitive functioning were identified at 2 weeks after TBI. These distinct phenotypesmay help optimize clinical decision-making regarding prognosis, as well as selection and stratification for randomized clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available