4.7 Article

Computer extracted gland features from H&E predicts prostate cancer recurrence comparably to a genomic companion diagnostic test: a large multi-site study

Journal

NPJ PRECISION ONCOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41698-021-00174-3

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [1U24CA199374-01, R01CA249992-01A1, R01CA202752-01A1, R01CA208236-01A1, R01CA216579-01A1, R01CA220581-01A1, 1U01CA239055-01, 1U01CA248226-01, 1U54CA254566-01]
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [1R01HL15127701A1]
  3. National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [1R43EB028736-01]
  4. National Center for Research Resources [1 C06 RR12463-01]
  5. United States Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service [IBX004121A]
  6. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Breast Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-19-1-0668]
  7. Prostate Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-15-1-0558, W81XWH-20-1-0851]
  8. Lung Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-18-1-0440, W81XWH-20-1-0595]
  9. Peer Reviewed Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-18-1-0404]
  10. Kidney Precision Medicine Project Glue Grant
  11. Ohio Third Frontier Technology Validation Fund
  12. Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Disparity Award [W81XWH-19-1-0720]
  13. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) component of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR0002548]
  14. NIH roadmap for Medical Research
  15. Wallace H. Coulter Foundation Program in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Case Western Reserve University
  16. National Science Foundation [CON501692]
  17. Sigrid Juselius Fellowship
  18. Finnish Cancer Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Histotyping is an automated BCR prognosis method that is tissue non-destructive and utilizes computational image analysis of morphologic patterns in prostate tissue. Through training and validation on a large number of patients, Histotyping demonstrates good prognostic performance in various clinically stratified subsets, independently of other clinical parameters. Its performance outperforms Decipher in predicting post-RP BCR.
Existing tools for post-radical prostatectomy (RP) prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR) prognosis rely on human pathologist-derived parameters such as tumor grade, with the resulting inter-reviewer variability. Genomic companion diagnostic tests such as Decipher tend to be tissue destructive, expensive, and not routinely available in most centers. We present a tissue non-destructive method for automated BCR prognosis, termed Histotyping, that employs computational image analysis of morphologic patterns of prostate tissue from a single, routinely acquired hematoxylin and eosin slide. Patients from two institutions (n = 214) were used to train Histotyping for identifying high-risk patients based on six features of glandular morphology extracted from RP specimens. Histotyping was validated for post-RP BCR prognosis on a separate set of n = 675 patients from five institutions and compared against Decipher on n = 167 patients. Histotyping was prognostic of BCR in the validation set (p < 0.001, univariable hazard ratio [HR] = 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.03-3.93, concordance index [c-index] = 0.68, median years-to-BCR: 1.7). Histotyping was also prognostic in clinically stratified subsets, such as patients with Gleason grade group 3 (HR = 4.09) and negative surgical margins (HR = 3.26). Histotyping was prognostic independent of grade group, margin status, pathological stage, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (multivariable p < 0.001, HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.40-3.10, n = 648). The combination of Histotyping, grade group, and preoperative PSA outperformed Decipher (c-index = 0.75 vs. 0.70, n = 167). These results suggest that a prognostic classifier for prostate cancer based on digital images could serve as an alternative or complement to molecular-based companion diagnostic tests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available