4.8 Review

Biobased polyurethanes for biomedical applications

Journal

BIOACTIVE MATERIALS
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 1083-1106

Publisher

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.002

Keywords

Polyurethanes; Biobased; Biomedical; Bioactive; Tissue engineering; Biocompatibility; Scaffold

Funding

  1. ANRT
  2. Peters Surgical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyurethanes (PUs) have a wide range of applications in the biomedical field, showing advanced properties such as controlled biotic and abiotic degradation. They possess precise tissue biomimicking structures and shape-recovery properties, making them suitable for cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. While substitution of fossil-based materials for biomedical implants is slowly improving, achieving higher renewable contents is still necessary for biobased certifications.
Polyurethanes (PUs) are a major family of polymers displaying a wide spectrum of physico-chemical, mechanical and structural properties for a large range of fields. They have shown suitable for biomedical applications and are used in this domain since decades. The current variety of biomass available has extended the diversity of starting materials for the elaboration of new biobased macromolecular architectures, allowing the development of biobased PUs with advanced properties such as controlled biotic and abiotic degradation. In this frame, new tunable biomedical devices have been successfully designed. PU structures with precise tissue biomimicking can be obtained and are adequate for adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of many cell's types. Moreover, new smart shape-memory PUs with adjustable shape-recovery properties have demonstrated promising results for biomedical applications such as wound healing. The fossil-based starting materials substitution for biomedical implants is slowly improving, nonetheless better renewable contents need to be achieved for most PUs to obtain biobased certifications. After a presentation of some PU generalities and an understanding of a biomaterial structure-biocompatibility relationship, recent developments of biobased PUs for non-implantable devices as well as short- and long-term implants are described in detail in this review and compared to more conventional PU structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available