4.8 Review

On the sustainability of lithium ion battery industry-A review and perspective

Journal

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages 186-212

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.019

Keywords

Spent Lithium ion battery; Recyling; Sustainability; Review and perspective

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51904340, 51834008]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2019YFC1907804, 2019YFC1907801]
  3. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST [2018QNRC001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines technologies and research efforts in battery recycling from the perspective of economic viability and life cycle inventory. It highlights the challenges facing battery recycling and the role of battery design and circular economy in the sustainable development of battery industry.
The consumption of rechargeable batteries has been increasing rapidly. High demand on specific metals for battery manufacturing and environmental impacts from battery disposal make it essential to recycle and retrieve materials from the spent batteries. There have been some review articles on battery recycling, mostly on the technologies for the materials recovery and some on life cycle assessment (LCA). To develop a truly sustainable battery industry, however, battery recycling must be commercially viable. Yet, very limited information on the economics of battery recycling is available. This paper examines technologies and research efforts in battery recycling from the perspective of economic viability and life cycle inventory. With the support of up-to-date statistics, the paper also comments on the challenges facing battery recycling, and the role of battery design and circular economy in the sustainable development of battery industry where governments, manufacturers and consumers all play a part.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available