4.7 Article

The value of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging for assessing treatment response of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 1848-1857

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4529-6

Keywords

Locally advanced rectal cancer; Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; Diffusion kurtosis imaging; D-app; ADC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the feasibility and value of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging in assessing treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Forty-one patients were included. All patients underwent pre- and post-CRT DCE-MRI on a 3.0-Tesla MRI scanner. Imaging indices (D (app) , K (app) and ADC values) were measured. Change value (a dagger X) and change ratio (ra dagger X) were calculated. Pathological tumour regression grade scores (Mandard) were the standard reference (good responders: pTRG 1-2; poor responders: pTRG 3-5). Diagnostic performance was compared using ROC analysis. For the pre-CRT measurements, pre-D (app-10th) was significantly lower in the good responder group than that of the poor responder group (p = 0.036). For assessing treatment response to neoadjuvant CRT, pre-D (app-10th) resulted in AUCs of 0.753 (p = 0.036) with a sensitivity of 66.67 % and a specificity of 77.78 %. The ra dagger D (app) had a relatively high AUC (0.859) and high sensitivity (100 %) compared with other image indices. DKI is feasible for selecting good responders for neoadjuvant CRT for LARC. aEuro cent LARC responded well after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with lower pre-D (app-10th) . aEuro cent LARC responded well with greater increases in mean ADC and D (app) . aEuro cent The change ratio of D (app) (ra dagger D (app) ) had a relatively better diagnostic performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available