4.7 Article

Combustion of B4C/KNO3 binary pyrotechnic system

Journal

DEFENCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 692-702

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2020.10.003

Keywords

Pyrotechnics; Combustion; Flame; Boron carbide

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study experimentally investigated the combustion of B4C/KNO3 binary pyrotechnic system, revealing that a decrease in B4C particle size leads to increased burning rate and flame temperature. The combustion properties of B4C/KNO3 are mainly determined by the mass ratio of the components.
Presented herein is an experimental study on the combustion of B4C/KNO3 binary pyrotechnic system. Combustion products were tested using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). According to the results of tests and CEA calculation, the combustion reaction equation was established. The flames and burning rates were recorded by a high speed camera and a spectrophotometer. The effect of B4C particle size on the thermal sensitivity of B4C/KNO3 was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) techniques. In addition, a reliable method for calculating the flame temperature was proposed. Based on the results of experiments, the combustion reaction mechanism was briefly analyzed. The burning rate, flame temperature and thermal sensitivity of B4C/KNO3 increase with the decrease of B4C particle size. The mass ratio of B4C/KNO3 has a great effect on combustion properties. Oxidizer-rich compositions have low flame temperatures, low burning rates, and provide green light emission. The combustion reactions of fuel-rich compositions are vigorous, and the B4C/KNO3 with mass ratio of 25:75 has the highest burning rate and the highest flame temperature. (C) 2020 China Ordnance Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available