4.7 Article

A Coupled Hydrodynamic-Equilibrium Type Beach Profile Evolution Model

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse9040353

Keywords

beach profiles; equilibrium models; sediment transport; morphological feedback; surf zone dissipation

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP14101302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An equilibrium beach profile model was developed and coupled with a parametric hydrodynamic model to provide feedback between morphology and hydrodynamics. The model was compared to laboratory profiles and showed accurate predictions for erosive and accretive conditions, with potential for improvement in linking dissipation and local transport.
An equilibrium beach profile model is developed and coupled with a parametric hydrodynamic model to provide feedback between the evolving morphology and the hydrodynamics. The model is compared to laboratory beach profiles evolving toward equilibrium conditions under constant forcing. The equilibrium model follows the classical approach but uses the bulk sediment transport as the governing model parameter. This approach is coupled with empirically derived and normalised sediment transport functions and a parametric surf zone wave transformation model. The dissipation predicted by the surf zone model controls the cross-shore position of the maxima in the sediment transport functions and hence the cross-shore evolution of the beach profile. Realistic beach profile shapes are generated for both erosive (barred) and accretive (bermed) beach profiles, and predictions of bar and berm position are satisfactory. With more complex normalised sediment transport functions, the model can be applied to conditions with a cyclical wave climate. However, the model concept is better associated with erosive wave conditions and further work is required to improve the link between the modelled dissipation and local transport for accretive conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available