4.7 Article

Toward an Understanding of Public Health Entrepreneurship and Intrapreneurship

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.593553

Keywords

design thinking; systems thinking; social enterprise and social entrepreneurship; entrepreneurship; government intrapreneurship; public health entrepreneurship; public health innovation

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR001863] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the significance of public health entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship, highlighting key themes including design thinking, resource mobilization, financial viability, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and systems strengthening. Case examples are used to illustrate the application of these themes in practice, providing valuable insights for entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship in the field of public health.
This paper describes a framework used to understand public health entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship for the purpose of pedagogy and practice. To ground this framework in the academic literature, a scoping review of the literature was conducted with application of a snowball method to identify further articles from the bibliographies of the search results. Recurring themes were identified to characterize common patterns of public health entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship. These themes were design thinking, resource mobilization, financial viability, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and systems strengthening. Case examples are provided to illustrate key themes in both intrapreneurship and entrepreneurship. This framework is a starting point to further the discourse, teaching, and practice of entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship in public health. More research is needed to understand implications for power and privilege, capacity building, financing, scaling, and policy making related to entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship in public health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available