Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Outcomes after distal pancreatectomy for neuroendocrine neoplasms: a retrospective comparison between minimally invasive and open approach using propensity score weighting
Stefano Partelli et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2021)
Cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study
Matteo De Pastena et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2021)
Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial
B. Bjornsson et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2020)
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center propensity score matching study
Ke Chen et al.
UPDATES IN SURGERY (2020)
Costs and quality of life in a randomized trial comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD trial)
J. van Hilst et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2019)
Multicentre observational cohort study of implementation and outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
S. Lof et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2019)
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD) A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Thijs de Rooij et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2019)
Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA)
Jony van Hilst et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2019)
A nationwide cohort study of resection rates and short-term outcomes in open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
Kjetil Soreide et al.
HPB (2019)
Propensity score-matched comparison of oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection
M. Raoof et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2018)
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: which factors are related to open conversion? Lessons learned from 68 consecutive procedures in a high-volume pancreatic center
Riccardo Casadei et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2018)
The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After
Claudio Bassi et al.
SURGERY (2017)
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer
Deniece Riviere et al.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2016)
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: many meta-analyses, few certainties
Claudio Ricci et al.
UPDATES IN SURGERY (2016)
Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Claudio Ricci et al.
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY (2015)
Multicenter comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy using propensity score-matching
Masafumi Nakamura et al.
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES (2015)
A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: It's time to randomize
Arianeb Mehrabi et al.
SURGERY (2015)
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: what factors are related to the learning curve?
Claudio Ricci et al.
SURGERY TODAY (2015)
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in Italy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Claudio Ricci et al.
HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL (2014)
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Is Associated With Significantly Less Overall Morbidity Compared to the Open Technique A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Raghunandan Venkat et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2012)
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Matched Studies Comparing Open and Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Is It a Safe Procedure?
Stephanos Pericleous et al.
PANCREAS (2012)
Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery:: A suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)
Moritz N. Wente et al.
SURGERY (2007)
Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) -: An International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition
Moritz N. Wente et al.
SURGERY (2007)
Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
D Dindo et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2004)
Share Paper
