4.4 Article

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single centre propensity score matching analysis

Journal

UPDATES IN SURGERY
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages 1747-1755

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01039-x

Keywords

Laparoscopic; Open; Distal pancreatectomy; Propensity score matching; Pancreas

Categories

Funding

  1. Alma Mater Studiorum - Universita di Bologna within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neoplasms and found that laparoscopic approach resulted in shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, lower postoperative morbidity, and decreased total costs. These advantages were also observed in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
The laparoscopic approach is considered as standard practice in patients with body-tail pancreatic neoplasms. However, only a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score matching (PSM) studies have been performed. Thus, additional studies are needed to obtain more robust evidence. This is a single-centre propensity score-matched study including patients who underwent laparoscopic (LDP) and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) with splenectomy for pancreatic neoplasms. Demographic, intra, postoperative and oncological data were collected. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay. The secondary endpoints included the assessment of the operative findings, postoperative outcomes, oncological outcomes (only in the subset of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-PDAC) and total costs. In total, 205 patients were analysed: 105 (51.2%) undergoing an open approach and 100 (48.8%) a laparoscopic approach. After PSM, two well-balanced groups of 75 patients were analysed and showed a shorter length of hospital stay (P = 0.001), a lower blood loss (P = 0.032), a reduced rate of postoperative morbidity (P < 0.001) and decreased total costs (P = 0.050) after LDP with respect to ODP. Regarding the subset of patients with PDAC, 22 patients were analysed: they showed a significant shorter length of hospital stay (P = 0.050) and a reduction in postoperative morbidity (P < 0.001) after LDP with respect to ODP. Oncological outcomes were similar. LDP showed lower hospital stay and postoperative morbidity rate than ODP both in the entire population and in patients affected by PDAC. Total costs were reduced only in the entire population. Oncological outcomes were comparable in PDAC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available