MYD88L265P Detection in IgM Monoclonal Gammopathies: Methodological Considerations for Routine Implementation

In IgM monoclonal gammopathies MYD88(L265P) is a prognostic and predictive biomarker of therapy response. MYD88(L265P) detection is mainly performed by allele-specific quantitative PCR (ASqPCR), however recently, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been proved to be suitable for MYD88(L265P) screening and minimal residual disease monitoring (MRD). This study compared ASqPCR and ddPCR to define the most sensitive method for MYD88(L265P) detection in bone marrow (BM), peripheral blood (PB) sorted or unsorted CD19+ cells, and in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Overall, the analysis showed a good concordance rate (74%) between the two methods, especially in BM samples, while discordances (26%) were mostly in favor of ddPCR (ddPCR+ vs. ASqPCR-) and were particularly evident in samples with low mutational burden, such as PB and cfDNA. This study highlights ddPCR as a feasible approach for MYD88(L265P) detection across different specimen types (including cfDNA). Interestingly, its high sensitivity makes CD19+ selection dispensable. On the other hand, our results showed that MYD88(L265P) detection on PB samples, especially with ASqPCR, is suboptimal for screening and MRD analysis. Finally, significantly different MYD88(L265P) mutational levels observed between Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients suggest the need for further studies in order to identify possible correlations between mutational levels and risk of progression to Waldenstrom.

Automated summary

The study revealed that ddPCR is a sensitive method for MYD88(L265P) detection, especially in bone marrow samples, with good results in peripheral blood and cell-free DNA samples as well. However, detection of MYD88(L265P) in peripheral blood samples, especially using ASqPCR, was found to be suboptimal and further studies are needed for optimization. Additionally, the observed differences in MYD88(L265P) mutational levels between Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients suggest the necessity for further research to identify correlations with progression risk to Waldenstrom.