4.7 Article

Performance Characteristics of Ankistrodesmus falcatus in Different Culture Media and Concentration

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10040755

Keywords

microalgae; specific growth rate; biochemical composition

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the growth media and culture concentration significantly influenced the growth and composition of Ankistrodesmus falcatus. BBM and COMBO media were more effective in promoting cell density, growth rate, biomass, and nutritional composition compared to Bristol medium, indicating that they are better choices for cultivating A. falcatus. Additionally, it was shown that using half of the media concentration can help reduce production costs.
This study determined the effect of growth media and culture concentration on the growth, proximate, and microelement composition of Ankistrodesmus falcatus. The culture of A. falcatus was done using three media, namely Modified COMBO Medium (COMBO), Bold's Basal Medium (BBM), and Bristol, at two concentrations (50% and 100%). The results obtained show that the cell density (>3.5 x 10(7) cells/mL), optical density (>0.24), and specific growth rate (>0.429%/day) were significantly higher (p <= 0.05) in BBM and COMBO than in Bristol (<3.1 x 10(7) cells/mL; <0.23; <0.416%/day, respectively) at both concentrations. However, biomass was higher in BBM (>2.20 g/L) than in COMBO (1.87-2.13 g/L), while Bristol had the lowest value observed (1.70-1.73 g/L). Biochemical and microelement composition showed variations between media and at the different concentrations, with higher values observed in BBM and COMBO. Based on the growth parameters and nutritional composition, it was concluded that BBM and COMBO were better media for the propagation of A. falcatus growth than Bristol. The study also demonstrated that the microalgae can be cultured using half of the media's concentration to lower production costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available