4.7 Article

Influence of Harvesting Time on the Chemical Composition of Wild Stinging Nettle (Urtica dioica L.)

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10040686

Keywords

antioxidant activity; chemical composition; harvesting time; stinging nettle

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical composition of stinging nettle was significantly affected by different harvesting times, with plants harvested in April having higher levels of soluble solids and certain elements, plants collected in May showing the best antioxidant activity, and plants harvested in July containing the highest amount of manganese.
This research aimed to determine the effect of different harvesting times on the chemical composition of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.). The leaves of nettle were harvested at the same place once a month in the period of April-September 2019. The analysis focused on the contents of dry matter, soluble solids, ascorbic acid, titratable acidity, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b, total carotenoids, total phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, ash content, and macro- and microelements. The nettles harvested in April were characterized by the highest levels of soluble solids and some macro-and microelements (P, K, Fe, Zn). The plants harvested in May were distinguished for titratable acidity, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid contents. In this month, the plants were determined to have the highest antioxidant activity during the entire vegetation period. The plants collected in July contained the highest amount of Mn, but the antioxidant activity of these plants was the lowest during the vegetation period. In August, the plants had the highest levels of ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds, and ash, while the plants collected in September were characterized by having the highest amounts of Ca, Mg, and B as compared to those established in other months of vegetation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available