4.7 Article

Design a Database of Italian Vascular Alimurgic Flora (AlimurgITA): Preliminary Results

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10040743

Keywords

wild edible plants (WEPs); database; AlimurgITA; ethnobotany; Italy

Categories

Funding

  1. PhD grants in Agriculture Technologies and Biotechnologies, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the abundance of data on Wild Edible Plants (WEPs) published in Italy, there is a lack of a comprehensive knowledge framework database. AlimurgITA was designed to address this gap, with 1103 WEP taxa already entered in the database, representing 13.09% of Italian flora. The most common family is Asteraceae.
Despite the large number of data published in Italy on WEPs, there is no database providing a complete knowledge framework. Hence the need to design a database of the Italian alimurgic flora: AlimurgITA. Only strictly alimurgic taxa were chosen, excluding casual alien and cultivated ones. The collected data come from an archive of 358 texts (books and scientific articles) from 1918 to date, chosen with appropriate criteria. For each taxon, the part of the plant used, the method of use, the chorotype, the biological form and the regional distribution in Italy were considered. The 1103 taxa of edible flora already entered in the database equal 13.09% of Italian flora. The most widespread family is that of the Asteraceae (20.22%); the most widely used taxa are Cichorium intybus and Borago officinalis. The not homogeneous regional distribution of WEPs (maximum in the south and minimum in the north) has been interpreted. Texts published reached its peak during the 2001-2010 decade. A database for Italian WEPs is important to have a synthesis and to represent the richness and complexity of this knowledge, also in light of its potential for cultural enhancement, as well as its applications for the agri-food system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available