4.5 Article

Predictors of Pharmaco-Resistance in Patients with Post-Stroke Epilepsy

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11040418

Keywords

brain infarct; cerebral hemorrhage; stroke

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that approximately 20% of patients with post-stroke epilepsy develop pharmaco-resistance, which is associated with younger age at stroke onset, stroke type and severity, occurrence of status epilepticus, and seizure types.
Objectives: The study aimed to explore the clinical predictors of pharmaco-resistance in patients with post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). Methods: Patients with epilepsy secondary to cerebral infarct or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage were included. The study outcome was the occurrence of pharmaco-resistance defined as the failure of adequate trials of two tolerated and appropriately chosen and used antiseizure medication schedules, whether as monotherapies or in combination, to achieve sustained seizure freedom. Results: One-hundred and fifty-nine patients with PSE and a median follow-up of 5 (3-9) years were included. The mean age of the patients at stroke onset was 56.7 (14.9) years, and 104 (65.4%) were males. In the study cohort, 29 participants were pharmaco-resistant. Age at stroke onset [odds ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-0.99; p = 0.044], history of intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.06-8.24; p = 0.039), severe stroke (OR 5.43, 95% CI 1.82-16.16; p = 0.002), status epilepticus as initial presentation of PSE (OR 7.90, 1.66-37.55; p = 0.009), and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.16-8.79; p = 0.025) were independent predictors of treatment refractoriness. Conclusions: Pharmaco-resistance developed in approximately 20% of patients with PSE and was associated with younger age at stroke onset, stroke type and severity, status epilepticus occurrence, and seizure types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available