4.5 Article

Psychological and Physiological Signatures of Music Listening in Different Listening Environments-An Exploratory Study

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11050593

Keywords

music; emotion; emotion regulation; stress reduction; cortisol

Categories

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland (Finnish Center of Excellence in Interdisciplinary Music Research)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that there were differences in participants' emotion ratings between listening to music at home and in the laboratory, and cortisol levels were generally lower at home. However, the modulatory effects of music on cortisol levels were not different between the two environments.
We compared music emotion ratings and their physiological correlates when the participants listened to music at home and in the laboratory. We hypothesized that music emotions are stronger in a familiar environment, that is, at home. Participants listened to their self-selected favorite and neutral music excerpts at home and in the laboratory for 10 min in each environment. They completed the questionnaires about their emotional states and gave saliva samples for the analyses of the stress hormone cortisol. We found that in the context of music listening, the participants' emotion ratings differed between home and the laboratory. Furthermore, the cortisol levels were generally lower at home than in the laboratory and decreased after music listening at home and in the laboratory. However, the modulatory effects of music listening on cortisol levels did not differ between the home and the laboratory. Our exploratory multimethodological data offer novel insight about the psychological and physiological consequences of music listening. These data reveal the sensitivity of the current research methods to investigate human emotions in various contexts without excluding the use of laboratory environment in investigating them.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available