4.5 Article

The Efficiency of Spa Rehabilitation in Chronic Ischemic Stroke Patients - Preliminary Reports

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11040501

Keywords

quality of life; stroke; spa rehabilitation; functional efficiency; spa hospital

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that spa rehabilitation has a positive impact on functional efficiency and quality of life in patients after a stroke, with long-term effects. Short-term effects do not seem to be affected by gender, age, and time from stroke onset, while long-term effects are related to the time from stroke onset.
Background: Rehabilitation-oriented therapy after a stroke must continue in various forms as a life-long effort. Aim: The study investigated the impact of spa rehabilitation on the quality of life and functional efficiency in patients after an ischemic stroke at a chronic stage of recovery. Methods: The assessment was carried out in a spa resort in southeastern Poland. It involved 32 patients with strokes who participated in a three-week rehabilitation program. Three examinations were performed: upon admission, on the day of discharge and at a two-month follow-up. The quality of life and functional efficiency were assessed with the WHOQOL-BREF and Barthel Index. Results: The quality of life was significantly higher in Exam II compared with Exam I (p < 0.001), and improvement was retained at the follow-up. The Barthel scores were higher in Exam II compared with Exam I (79.84 vs. 68.59), while the differences between the scores in Exams II and III were small (p = 0.039). Conclusions: Three-week spa rehabilitation seems to favorably affect the functional efficiency and quality of life after a stroke. The effects appear to be long-term. The gender, age and time from stroke onset do not seem to impact short-term effects. However, long-term effects are related to the time from stroke onset.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available