4.5 Article

Assessing Age-Related Gray Matter Differences in Young Adults with Voxel-Based Morphometry: The Effect of Field Strengths

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11040447

Keywords

voxel-based morphometry (VBM); gray matter; field strength; visual cortex; cerebellum

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 107-2314-B-039-056-MY3]
  2. China Medical University [CMU109-MF-94]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified patterns of gray matter volume changes with age in a young population, highlighting the influence of field strength on results and the importance of considering this factor when comparing brain differences across studies.
Knowing the patterns of brain differences with age in the young population could lead to a better understanding of the causes of certain psychiatric disorders; however, relevant information is insufficient. Here, a pattern of regional gray matter (GM) that changed with age in a young cohort aged 20-30 years was provided. Extending from previous age studies, all participants were imaged at both 1.5 T and 3 T to address the question of how far the field strength influences results. Fifty-nine young participants aged 20-30 years were scanned at both 1.5 T and 3 T. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was used to estimate the GM volume. Some brain regions showed a significant field strength-dependent difference in GM volume. VBM uncovered a significantly age-related increase in the GM volume in the left visual-associated area at 3 T, which was not detected at 1.5 T. In addition, voxels at 1.5 T that revealed a significant age-related reduction in the GM volume were found in the right cerebellum. In conclusion, age-related differences in human brain morphology could even be detected in a young cohort aged 20-30 years; however, the results varied across field strengths. Thus, field strength should be considered an important factor when comparing age-specific brain differences across studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available