4.7 Article

Chickpea and Chestnut Flours as Non-Gluten Alternatives in Cookies

Journal

FOODS
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10050911

Keywords

chickpea; chestnut; cookie; acceptability; nutritional quality

Funding

  1. FEDER-Interreg Espana-Portugal programme through the project TRANSCOLAB [0612_TRANS_CO_LAB_2_P]
  2. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) through national funds FCT/MCTES [UIDB/00690/2020]
  3. FCT through the individual scientific employment program [CEECIND/00831/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests using a mix of chickpea flour and chestnut flour in cookies to improve their acceptability, properties, and nutritional value. The presence of chestnut flour in the mix enhances the rheological properties of the dough and cookie dimensions, while also improving the nutritional quality of the cookies.
This study proposes the use of a mix composed of chickpea flour and chestnut flour in cookies, aiming to improve their acceptability. Cookie properties and nutritional value were also analysed. The gluten-free cookies were made by using different mixes of chickpea and chestnut flours (0:100, 25:75, 50:50, 75:25, 100:0). Dough rheology and cookie dimensions, texture, external colour and acceptability were evaluated. The presence of the chestnut flour increased the values of G' and G, but reduced the loss factor (tan delta) when compared with the doughs made with chickpea flour. Chestnut flour also decreased the diameter and the spread ratio of the cookies, while increasing the hardness and darkening of the cookies. Furthermore, adding chestnut to the flour mixture increased the nutritional quality of the cookies by adding unsaturated fatty acids and fibre. The use of reduced percentages of chestnut flour (25%) resulted in masking the off-flavour of the chickpea flour, which improved the cookie's acceptability without significantly changing the dough rheology, cookie dimensions, hardness, or lightness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available