4.7 Article

High-Moisture Meat Analogues Produced from Yellow Pea and Faba Bean Protein Isolates/Concentrate: Effect of Raw Material Composition and Extrusion Parameters on Texture Properties

Journal

FOODS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10040843

Keywords

high-moisture extrusion (HME); plant protein; meat analogue; yellow pea; faba bean; pulses

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council FORMAS [942-2016-38]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the functionality of local yellow pea and faba bean protein isolates/concentrates as meat analogue products and successfully produces high-moisture meat analogues with fibrous layered structures through extrusion. The texture properties of the HMMA are mainly influenced by protein content, ash, fiber, water-holding capacity, and extrusion process parameters.
Yellow pea and faba bean are potential candidates to replace soybean-based ingredients due to their suitability for cultivation in the northern hemisphere, non-genetically modified organisms cultivation practice and low risk of allergenicity. This study examined the functionality of local yellow pea and faba bean protein isolates/concentrate as meat analogue products. The most critical factors affecting the texture properties of meat analogue were also determined. Extrusion was used to produce high-moisture meat analogues (HMMAs) from yellow pea and faba bean protein isolates/concentrates and HMMAs with fibrous layered structures was successfully produced from both imported commercial and local sources. The texture properties of the HMMA produced were mainly affected by the ash, fiber and protein content and water-holding capacity of the source protein. Three extrusion process parameters (target moisture content, extrusion temperature, screw speed), also significantly affected HMMA texture. In conclusion, functional HMMA can be produced using protein isolates derived from locally grown pulses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available