4.7 Article

Germinated Buckwheat: Effects of Dehulling on Phenolics Profile and Antioxidant Activity of Buckwheat Seeds

Journal

FOODS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10040740

Keywords

buckwheat; dehulling; germination; LC-MS; free phenolic; bound phenolic; antioxidant activity

Funding

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P4-0234]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that cold dehulled germinated buckwheat seeds have higher levels of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity, making them a promising ingredient for functional foods rich in beneficial phenolic compounds.
The aim was to investigate the effects of the cold dehulling of buckwheat seeds on their germination, total phenolic content (TPC), antioxidant activity (AA) and phenolics composition. Cold dehulling had no negative effects on germination rate and resulted in faster rootlet growth compared to hulled seeds. Although the dehulling of the seeds significantly decreased TPC and AA, the germination of dehulled seeds resulted in 1.8-fold and 1.9-fold higher TPC and AA compared to hulled seeds. Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry identified several phenolic compounds in free and bound forms. Rutin was the major compound in hulled seeds (98 mu g/g dry weight), orientin and vitexin in 96-h germinated dehulled seeds (2205, 1869 mu g/g dry weight, respectively). During germination, the increases in the major phenolic compounds were around two orders of magnitude, which were greater than the increases for TPC and AA. As well as orientin and vitexin, high levels of other phenolic compounds were detected for dehulled germinated seeds (e.g., isoorientin, rutin; 1402, 967 mu g/g dry weight, respectively). These data show that dehulled germinated seeds of buckwheat have great potential for use in functional foods as a dietary source of phenolic compounds with health benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available