4.7 Article

Application of Bernstein collocation method for solving the generalized regularized long wave equations

Journal

AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 4081-4089

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.04.005

Keywords

Bernstein collocation method; RLW equation; MRLW equation; Kronecker product; Partial differential equations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The RLW and MRLW equations are numerically solved using Bernstein polynomials in both space and time directions based on Kronecker product. A new Bernstein collocation method is applied and convergence study is conducted. Conservation properties and accuracy testing are also investigated in this study.
The regularized and the modified regularized long wave (RLW and MRLW) equations are solved numerically by the Bernstein polynomials in both the space and time directions based on Kronecker product. In this paper, we applied a fully different Bernstein collocation method than the other methods which used Bernstein polynomials to solve the problems. The approximate solution is defined by the Bernstein polynomials in all directions. A general form for any m derivative of any Bernstein polynomials is constructed. A general matrix form for the vector of any m derivative of any Bernstein polynomials is also constructed. Convergence study for the proposed numerical scheme is investigated. To determine the conservation properties of the RLW and MRLW equations, three invariants of motion (I-1, I-2 and I-3) are computed. To test the accuracy, two error norms (parallel to E parallel to(2) and parallel to E parallel to(infinity)) are evaluated. Numerical outcomes and comparisons with other techniques for the single and the interaction of two solitary waves for RLW and MRLW equations are presented. (C) 2021 THE AUTHOR. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available