Journal
JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages -Publisher
JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/23328
Keywords
generative adversarial network; unsupervised deep learning; computed tomography; synthetic body images; visual Turing test
Categories
Funding
- National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2018R1C1B6006371]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study successfully synthesized highly realistic body CT images using PGGAN, however, limitations were found in accuracy of images in the thoracoabdominal junction and anatomical details. Radiologists had difficulties in identifying real from synthetic images.
Background: Generative adversarial network (GAN)-based synthetic images can be viable solutions to current supervised deep learning challenges. However, generating highly realistic images is a prerequisite for these approaches. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate and validate the unsupervised synthesis of highly realistic body computed tomography (CT) images by using a progressive growing GAN (PGGAN) trained to learn the probability distribution of normal data. Methods: We trained the PGGAN by using 11,755 body CT scans. Ten radiologists (4 radiologists with <5 years of experience [Group I], 4 radiologists with 5-10 years of experience [Group II], and 2 radiologists with >10 years of experience [Group III]) evaluated the results in a binary approach by using an independent validation set of 300 images (150 real and 150 synthetic) to judge the authenticity of each image. Results: The mean accuracy of the 10 readers in the entire image set was higher than random guessing (1781/3000, 59.4% vs 1500/3000, 50.0%, respectively; P<.001). However, in terms of identifying synthetic images as fake, there was no significant difference in the specificity between the visual Turing test and random guessing (779/1500, 51.9% vs 750/1500, 50.0%, respectively; P=.29). The accuracy between the 3 reader groups with different experience levels was not significantly different (Group I, 696/1200, 58.0%; Group II, 726/1200, 60.5%; and Group III, 359/600, 59.8%; P=.36). Interreader agreements were poor (kappa=0.11) for the entire image set. In subgroup analysis, the discrepancies between real and synthetic CT images occurred mainly in the thoracoabdominal junction and in the anatomical details. Conclusions: The GAN can synthesize highly realistic high-resolution body CT images that are indistinguishable from real images; however, it has limitations in generating body images of the thoracoabdominal junction and lacks accuracy in the anatomical details.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available