4.6 Review

Glioblastoma Metabolomics-In Vitro Studies

Journal

METABOLITES
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo11050315

Keywords

glioblastoma multiforme; in vitro metabolomics; phamacometabolomics

Funding

  1. Doctoral School of Medical Sciences and Health Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The WHO introduced new guidelines for the diagnosis of brain gliomas in 2016 based on new genomic markers, providing a higher level of precision. Metabolomics is a promising tool for analyzing GBM tumors and potential treatment methods, with cell cultures playing a crucial role in GBM metabolomics research.
In 2016, the WHO introduced new guidelines for the diagnosis of brain gliomas based on new genomic markers. The addition of these new markers to the pre-existing diagnostic methods provided a new level of precision for the diagnosis of glioma and the prediction of treatment effectiveness. Yet, despite this new classification tool, glioblastoma (GBM), a grade IV glioma, continues to have one of the highest mortality rates among central nervous system tumors. Metabolomics is a particularly promising tool for the analysis of GBM tumors and potential methods of treating them, as it is the only omics approach that is capable of providing a metabolic signature of a tumor's phenotype. With careful experimental design, cell cultures can be a useful matrix in GBM metabolomics, as they ensure stable conditions and, under proper conditions, are capable of capturing different tumor phenotypes. This paper reviews in vitro metabolomic profiling studies of high-grade gliomas, with a particular focus on sample-preparation techniques, crucial metabolites identified, cell culture conditions, in vitro-in vivo extrapolation, and pharmacometabolomics. Ultimately, this review aims to elucidate potential future directions for in vitro GBM metabolomics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available