4.5 Article

Serological and Molecular Prevalence of Babesia caballi in Apparently Healthy Horses in Israel

Journal

PATHOGENS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10040445

Keywords

equine piroplasmosis; Babesia caballi; IFAT; nested PCR; risk factors

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates a high level of exposure to Babesia caballi and identifies important risk factors for infection. The difference between serological and molecular prevalence, probably related to parasite clearance, is highlighted. Geographical area and horses' sex remained significant factors in the multivariable analysis.
Babesia caballi is a tick-borne hemoparasite of equines and one of the causative agents of equine piroplasmosis, which poses a great concern for the equine industry regarding animal welfare and international horse movement. The parasite is endemic in Israel; however, its seroprevalence in the area was never evaluated due to antigenic heterogenicity in the gene used in the commercially available kit. Blood samples were collected from 257 horses at 19 farms throughout the country and screened for the presence of anti-B. caballi antibodies via an indirect immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and for the presence of parasite DNA by nested PCR. The seroprevalence of B. caballi was 69.6% and its molecular prevalence was 9.7%. The geographical area, horse's sex, breed, housing, exposure to ticks, and specifically to Hyalomma marginatum, and co-infection with Theileria equi were found to be significantly associated with serologic exposure in univariable analysis, while the geographical area and horses' sex remained significant in the multivariable analysis. The results of this study demonstrate a high level of exposure to B. caballi and identify important risk factors for infection. The difference between the serological and molecular prevalence, probably related to parasite clearance, is also highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available