4.6 Review

Oncoimmunology Meets Organs-on-Chip

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.627454

Keywords

cancer immunology; microfluidic device; Cell on Chip; Organ on Chip; tumor microenvironment; personalized medicine; Oncoimmuno chip; human on chip

Funding

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research [AIRC IG 21366]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The infiltration of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment is an early event that leads to the establishment of dynamic cross-talk. Immune cells sense antigenic cues to mount a specific anti-tumor response while cancer cells emit inhibitory signals to dampen it.
Oncoimmunology represents a biomedical research discipline coined to study the roles of immune system in cancer progression with the aim of discovering novel strategies to arm it against the malignancy. Infiltration of immune cells within the tumor microenvironment is an early event that results in the establishment of a dynamic cross-talk. Here, immune cells sense antigenic cues to mount a specific anti-tumor response while cancer cells emanate inhibitory signals to dampen it. Animals models have led to giant steps in this research context, and several tools to investigate the effect of immune infiltration in the tumor microenvironment are currently available. However, the use of animals represents a challenge due to ethical issues and long duration of experiments. Organs-on-chip are innovative tools not only to study how cells derived from different organs interact with each other, but also to investigate on the crosstalk between immune cells and different types of cancer cells. In this review, we describe the state-of-the-art of microfluidics and the impact of OOC in the field of oncoimmunology underlining the importance of this system in the advancements on the complexity of tumor microenvironment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available