Journal
ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages -Publisher
AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3998
Keywords
Causal inference; observational study; propensity score matching (PSM); R programming language
Categories
Funding
- Shanghai Municipal Health Commission [2019ZB0105]
- Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [20ZR1411100]
- Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader [20XD1421000]
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [82070085]
- Clinical Research Funds of Zhongshan Hospital [2020ZSLC38, 2020ZSLC27]
- Smart Medical Care of Zhongshan Hospital [2020ZHZS01]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article discusses the increasing importance of accurately estimating the effects of clinical treatments, as well as the advantages and limitations of propensity score methods in observational studies.
It is increasingly important to accurately and comprehensively estimate the effects of particular clinical treatments. Although randomization is the current gold standard, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often limited in practice due to ethical and cost issues. Observational studies have also attracted a great deal of attention as, quite often, large historical datasets are available for these kinds of studies. However, observational studies also have their drawbacks, mainly including the systematic differences in baseline covariates, which relate to outcomes between treatment and control groups that can potentially bias results. Propensity score methods, which are a series of balancing methods in these studies, have become increasingly popular by virtue of the two major advantages of dimension reduction and design separation. Within this approach, propensity score matching (PSM) has been empirically proven, with outstanding performances across observational datasets. While PSM tutorials are available in the literature, there is still room for improvement. Some PSM tutorials provide step-by-step guidance, but only one or two packages have been covered, thereby limiting their scope and practicality. Several articles and books have expounded upon propensity scores in detail, exploring statistical principles and theories; however, the lack of explanations on function usage in programming language has made it difficult for researchers to understand and follow these materials. To this end, this tutorial was developed with a six-step PSM framework, in which we summarize the recent updates and provide step-by-step guidance to the R programming language. This tutorial offers researchers with a broad survey of PSM, ranging from data preprocessing to estimations of propensity scores, and from matching to analyses. We also explain generalized propensity scoring for multiple or continuous treatments, as well as time-dependent PSM. Lastly, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of propensity score methods.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available