4.3 Article

Quality and consistency of clinical practice guidelines for treating children with COVID-19

Journal

ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AME PUBLISHING COMPANY
DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-7000

Keywords

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs); quality appraisal; consistency analysis; Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19); children

Funding

  1. National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders (Children?s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China) [NCRCCHD2020EP01]
  2. Special Fund for Key Research and Development Projects in Gansu Province in 2020
  3. Fourth Batch of Special Project of Science and Technology for Emergency Response to COVID19 of Chongqing Science and Technology Bureau
  4. Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province [GSEBMKT2020YJ01]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky2020sp14]
  6. Research on Response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak in Gansu Province [20ZD016]
  7. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1705500, 2019YFC1712000]
  8. 2020 Key R&D project of Gansu Province [20YF2FA027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The review found that the current guidelines for treating children with COVID-19 lack high methodological and reporting quality, with significant inconsistencies in recommendations and very limited supporting evidence.
Background: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic negatively affects children's health. Many guidelines have been developed for treating children with COVID-19. The quality of the existing guidelines and the consistency of recommendations remains unknown. Therefore, we aim to review the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for children with COVID-19 systematically. Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, guideline-related websites, and Google. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool and Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) checklist were used to evaluate the methodological and reporting quality of the included guidelines, respectively. The consistency of recommendations across the guidelines and their supporting evidence were analyzed. Results: Twenty guidelines were included in this study. The mean AGREE II score and mean RIGHT reporting rate of the included guidelines were 37% (range, 22-62%) and 52% (range, 31-89%), respectively. As for methodological quality, no guideline was classified as high, one guideline (5%) moderate, and 19 (95%) low. In terms of reporting quality, one guideline (5%) was rated as high, 12 guidelines (60%) moderate, and seven (35%) low. Among included guidelines, recommendations varied greatly in the use of remdesivir (recommend: 25%, not recommend: 45%, not report: 30%), interferon (recommend: 15%, not recommend: 50%, not report: 35%), glucocorticoids (recommend: 50%, not recommend: 20%, not report: 30%), and intravenous immune globulin (recommend: 35%, not recommend: 30%, not report: 35%). None of the guidelines cited clinical trials from children with COVID-19. Conclusions: The methodological and reporting quality of guidelines for treating children with COVID-19 was not high. Recommendations were inconsistent across different guidelines. The supporting evidence from children with COVID-19 was very limited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available