4.6 Article

Modelling Sand Fly Lutzomyia longipalpis Attraction to Host Odour: Synthetic Sex-Aggregation Pheromone Dominates the Response

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9030602

Keywords

Leishmania; vector biology; host choice; disease prevention; sex-aggregation pheromone; Lutzomyia longipalpis

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT091689MF]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The synthetic pheromone can attract approximately 53% of host-seeking female Lu. longipalpis, out-competing other host odors. This suggests that the synthetic pheromone can lure vectors away from humans and dogs, thereby providing protection against transmission of zoontic visceral leishmaniasis.
Zoontic visceral leishmaniasis (ZVL) due to Leishmania infantum is a potentially fatal protozoan parasitic disease of humans and dogs. In the Americas, dogs are the reservoir and the sand fly, Lutzomyia longipalpis, the principal vector. A synthetic version of the male sand fly produced sex-aggregation pheromone attracts both female and male conspecifics to co-located insecticide, reducing both reservoir infection and vector abundance. However the effect of the synthetic pheromone on the vector's choice of host (human, animal reservoir, or dead-end host) for blood feeding in the presence of the pheromone is less well understood. In this study, we developed a modelling framework to allow us to predict the relative attractiveness of the synthetic pheromone and potential alterations in host choice. Our analysis indicates that the synthetic pheromone can attract 53% (95% CIs: 39%-86%) of host-seeking female Lu. longipalpis and thus it out-competes competing host odours. Importantly, the results suggest that the synthetic pheromone can lure vectors away from humans and dogs, such that when co-located with insecticide, it provides protection against transmission leading to human and canine ZVL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available