4.7 Article

Assessing Various Control Samples for Microarray Gene Expression Profiling of Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Journal

BIOMOLECULES
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom11040588

Keywords

epithelial cells; gene expression profiling; laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC); multidimensional scaling; primary tumor; microarray

Funding

  1. Polish National Science Centre [2016/23/B/NZ2/03041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that control samples and malignant samples were mainly separated by malignancy and cell culture-microenvironment. It is suggested to use cultured epithelial cells as controls for gene expression profiling of cancer cell lines.
Selection of optimal control samples is crucial in expression profiling tumor samples. To address this issue, we performed microarray expression profiling of control samples routinely used in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma studies: human bronchial and tracheal epithelial cells, squamous cells obtained by laser uvulopalatoplasty and tumor surgical margins. We compared the results using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering versus tumor samples and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. A general observation from our study is that the analyzed cohorts separated according to two dominant factors: malignancy, which separated controls from malignant samples and cell culture-microenvironment which reflected the differences between cultured and non-cultured samples. In conclusion, we advocate the use of cultured epithelial cells as controls for gene expression profiling of cancer cell lines. In contrast, comparisons of gene expression profiles of cancer cell lines versus surgical margin controls should be treated with caution, whereas fresh frozen surgical margins seem to be appropriate for gene expression profiling of tumor samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available