4.4 Article

The discovery, distribution, and diversity of DNA viruses associated with Drosophila melanogaster in Europe

Journal

VIRUS EVOLUTION
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ve/veab031

Keywords

DNA virus; endogenous viral element; Drosophila; nudivirus; galbut virus; filamentous virus; adintovirus; densovirus; bidnavirus

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environmental Research Council through the E3 doctoral training programme [NE/L002558/1]
  2. Wellcome Trust PhD programme [108905/Z/15/Z]
  3. BBSRC [BB/P00685X/1]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A-182262, PP00P3_165836, PP00P3_133641/1]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-15-CE32-0011-01]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [H2020-ERC-2014-CoG-647900]
  7. Fundacion Espanola para la Ciencia y la Tecnologia-Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [FCT-15-10187]
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [STA1154/4-1, 408908608, GR 4495/2, PA 903/8]
  9. Academy of Finland [268214, 322980]
  10. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P32275]
  11. Danish Research council for natural Sciences (FNU) [4002-00113B]
  12. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [214Z238]
  13. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [451-03-68/2020-14/200007, 451-03-68/2020-14/200178]
  14. Special Topics Network (STN)
  15. Special Topics Network (STN) by European Society of Evolutionary Biology (ESEB)
  16. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_182262, PP00P3_165836] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  17. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P32275] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  18. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-15-CE32-0011] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  19. Academy of Finland (AKA) [322980] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified 14 DNA viruses from Drosophila collected in Europe, including three new nudiviruses and a virus related to entomopoxvirus. Drosophila Kallithea nudivirus and Drosophila Vesanto virus were found to be relatively common, while the other viruses were rare. This suggests that DNA viruses are less prevalent in Drosophila compared to RNA viruses and may not persist as well in laboratory cultures.
Drosophila melanogaster is an important model for antiviral immunity in arthropods, but very few DNA viruses have been described from the family Drosophilidae. This deficiency limits our opportunity to use natural host-pathogen combinations in experimental studies, and may bias our understanding of the Drosophila virome. Here, we report fourteen DNA viruses detected in a metagenomic analysis of 6668 pool-sequenced Drosophila, sampled from forty-seven European locations between 2014 and 2016. These include three new nudiviruses, a new and divergent entomopoxvirus, a virus related to Leptopilina boulardi filamentous virus, and a virus related to Musca domestica salivary gland hypertrophy virus. We also find an endogenous genomic copy of galbut virus, a double-stranded RNA partitivirus, segregating at very low frequency. Remarkably, we find that Drosophila Vesanto virus, a small DNA virus previously described as a bidnavirus, may be composed of up to twelve segments and thus represent a new lineage of segmented DNA viruses. Two of the DNA viruses, Drosophila Kallithea nudivirus and Drosophila Vesanto virus are relatively common, found in 2 per cent or more of wild flies. The others are rare, with many likely to be represented by a single infected fly. We find that virus prevalence in Europe reflects the prevalence seen in publicly available datasets, with Drosophila Kallithea nudivirus and Drosophila Vesanto virus the only ones commonly detectable in public data from wild-caught flies and large population cages, and the other viruses being rare or absent. These analyses suggest that DNA viruses are at lower prevalence than RNA viruses in D.melanogaster, and may be less likely to persist in laboratory cultures. Our findings go some way to redressing an earlier bias toward RNA virus studies in Drosophila, and lay the foundation needed to harness the power of Drosophila as a model system for the study of DNA viruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available