4.3 Article

The complete mitogenome of the Mountain chicken frog, Leptodactylus fallax

Journal

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PART B-RESOURCES
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 1372-1373

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2021.1907809

Keywords

Leptodactylus fallax; mitogenome; phylogeny

Funding

  1. Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust
  2. Zoological Society of London
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council-funded South West Biosciences Doctoral Training Partnership [BB/M009122/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mountain chicken frog, native to the Caribbean islands of Dominica and Montserrat, is critically endangered with over 85% decline in its populations over the past 25 years, largely due to a chytridiomycosis outbreak. Researchers assembled the complete mitochondrial genome of the frog, contributing the first complete mitogenome of the genus Leptodactylus. Phylogenetic analysis shows a close relationship between L. fallax and Leptodactylus melanonotus, highlighting the evolutionary connections within Leptodactylus spp. and other species in the superfamily Hyloidea.
The mountain chicken frog (Leptodactylus fallax) is a critically endangered frog native to the Caribbean islands of Dominica and Montserrat. Over the past 25 years their populations have declined by over 85%, largely due to a chytridiomycosis outbreak that nearly wiped out the Montserratian population. Within the context of developing tools that can aid in the conservation of the mountain chicken frog, we assembled its complete mitochondrial genome, contributing the first complete mitogenome of the genus Leptodactylus (Genbank Accession number MW260634). The circular genome is 18,669 bp long and contains 37 genes. A phylogenetic analysis reveals that L. fallax forms a clade with Leptodactylus melanonotus, highlighting the close relationship of Leptodactylus spp. relative to other species from the superfamily Hyloidea included in the analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available