4.5 Article

Converting biomass of agrowastes and invasive plant into alternative materials for water remediation

Journal

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 5391-5406

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-021-01526-6

Keywords

Dye; Biomass; Biochar; Slow pyrolysis; Water treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, three types of biomass were converted into biochars and investigated for their ability to remove dyes in water. The results showed that the biochars were effective in removing methylene blue, but different biochars had different optimal adsorption conditions.
Three types of biomass of invasive plants and agrowastes, namely, the wattle bark of Acacia auriculiformis (BA), mimosa (BM), and coffee husks (BC), were converted into biochars through slow pyrolysis and investigated for their ability to remove dyes in water. The properties of the materials were characterized using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis. The BET surface area (total pore volume) of BC was 2.62 m(2)/g (0.007 cm(3)/g), far below those of BA and BM with 393.15 cm(2)/g (0.195 m(3)/g) and 285.53 cm(2)/g (0.153 m(3)/g), respectively. The optimal adsorption doses for the removal of methylene blue (MB) were found to be 2, 5, and 5 g/L for BC, BA, and BM, respectively. The suitable pH ranges for MB removal were 6-12 for BA, 7-12 for BC, and 2-10 for BM. The majority of MB (over 83%) was removed in the initial 30 min, followed by a more quasisteady state condition after the removal rate exceeded 90%. The experimental data were fitted with the kinetic models (PFO, PSO, Bangham, IDP), indicating that physicochemical adsorption, pore diffusion process, and multiple stages are the dominant mechanisms for the MB adsorption onto biochars. Finally, BA and BM showed similar adsorption efficiencies, while BC may not be favorable for use as an adsorbent due to its low surface area and low pore volume.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available