4.6 Article

Impacts of bioenergy sustainable growth on food security in EU28 region: an empirical analysis

Journal

ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 17423-17442

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01393-1

Keywords

Food supply; Bioenergy sustainability; Governance quality; EU28 region

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research shows that bioenergy growth has a positive impact on food supply in EU countries, especially in underdeveloped countries, while governance quality and population density play a more significant role in developed countries.
This research analyzes the influence of bioenergy use on food supply in the 28 European Union (EU) countries under the governance quality system in 1990-2018. We used the pooled ordinary least squares technique and found that bioenergy growth (under the quality governance system), fossil fuel, and gross domestic product appears to increase food supply more in 13 European Union (EU13) underdeveloped countries. On the other hands, governance quality and population density have greatly affected food supply in 15 European Union developed countries (EU15) compared with EU13 European countries. These findings imply that the number of bioenergy resources which could be used directly in agricultural food chain end-use sectors will effectively increase food supply and thus contribute to the global warming objective. The results were verified by the pooled least squares (Pooled OLS) and fixed effect methods. The study recommends that the Member States of the European Union increase bioenergy in the energy mix to improve food supply, as systematic output does not compete with food-producing resources. The authorities should illustrate organized food supply and bioenergy policy by developing alternative strategies for reducing fossil fuel power and related CO2 emissions, according to the unique characteristics of both developed and developing countries in the EU.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available