4.7 Article

A Mixture of Green Waste Compost and Biomass Combustion Ash for Recycled Nutrient Delivery to Soil

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11040641

Keywords

biofuel ash; green waste compost; nutrients; heavy metals

Funding

  1. Engineering for Agricultural Production Systems program from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Washington, DC, USA) [2020-67022-31144]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of biofuel ash and green waste compost can improve soil properties and increase wheat and triticale yields. Using GWC with BA can result in fewer heavy metals transferred to crops compared to using BA alone.
The use of major nutrient-containing solid residuals, such as recycled solid waste materials, has a strong potential in closing the broken nutrient cycles. In this work, biofuel ash (BA) combined with green waste compost (GWC) was used as a nutrient source to improve soil properties and enhance wheat and triticale yields. The main goal was to obtain the nutrient and heavy metal release dynamics and ascertain whether GWC together with BA can potentially be used for concurrent bioremediation to mitigate any negative solid waste effects on the environment. Both BA and GWC were applied in the first year of study. No fertilization was performed in the second year of the study. The results obtained in this work showed the highest spring wheat yield when the GWC (20 t ha(-1)) and BA (4.5 t ha(-1)) mixture was used. After the first harvest, the increase in the mobile forms of all measured nutrients was detected in the soil with complex composted materials (GWC + BA). The content of heavy metals (Cd, Zn, and Cr) in the soil increased significantly with BA and all GWC + BA mixtures. In both experiment years, the application of BA together with GWC resulted in fewer heavy metals transferred to the crops than with BA alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available