4.4 Article

Chinese Association for the Study of Pain: Expert consensus on chronic postsurgical pain

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages 2090-+

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2090

Keywords

Chronic postsurgical pain; Treatment; Interventional; Prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This consensus on chronic postsurgical pain was developed under the leadership of the Chinese Association for the Study of Pain by an editorial committee composed of experts in relevant fields. The consensus was based on literature review and expert opinions, establishing strong and weak recommendation levels.
Chronic postsurgical pain is a common surgical complication that severely reduces a patient's quality of life. Many perioperative interventions and management strategies have been developed for reducing and managing chronic postsurgical pain. Under the leadership of the Chinese Association for the Study of Pain, an editorial committee was formed for chronic postsurgical pain diagnosis and treatment by experts in relevant fields. The editorial committee composed the main content and framework of this consensus and established a working group. The working group conducted literature review (1989-2020) using key words such as surgery, post-surgical, post-operative, pain, chronic, and persistent in different databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Only publications in the English language were included. The types of literature included systematic reviews, randomized controlled studies, cohort studies and case reports. This consensus was written based on clinical practice combined with literature evidence. The first draft of the consensus was rigorously reviewed and edited by all the editorial committee experts before being finalized. The level of evidence was assessed by methodological experts based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. The strength of recommendation was evaluated by all editorial committee experts, and the opinions of most experts were adopted as the final decision. The recommendation level strong generally refers to recommendations based on high-level evidence and consistency between clinical behavior and expected results. The recommendation level weak generally refers to the uncertainty between clinical behavior and expected results based on low-level evidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available