Journal
WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages 2238-2246Publisher
BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i10.2238
Keywords
Polyethylene glycol; Simethicone; Colonoscopy; Bowel preparation; Cleansing efficacy
Categories
Funding
- Natural Science Foundation of Wuhan [WX18Y04]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study compared the cleansing efficacy of 3 L PEG plus simethicone with 4 L PEG. Although there were no significant differences in overall bowel cleansing effectiveness between the two groups, the 3 L PEG plus simethicone group had higher scores in the right-side colon and better bubble elimination. Additionally, more proximal adenomas were detected in the 3 L PEG plus simethicone group, suggesting that this regimen has the potential to improve adenoma detection in Chinese patients.
BACKGROUND Four-liter polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions are effective for bowel cleansing, but their large volume might hinder patient compliance. Due to the unique features of Asians, 4 L PEG might be a suboptimal bowel preparation in predominantly ethnically Asian countries. In view of this, a balance should be achieved between the volume and effectiveness. The ideal bowel cleansing regimen for a colonoscopy has yet to be determined in a Chinese population. AIM To compare the cleansing efficacy of 3 L PEG plus simethicone with 4 L PEG. METHODS A total of 291 patients were randomly allocated to two groups: Group 1 (n = 145) received 4 L split-dose PEG (4-P); group 2 (n = 146) received 3 L split-dose PEG plus simethicone (3-PS). Bowel-cleansing efficacy was evaluated by endoscopists using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) and the bubbles score. RESULTS Although there were no significant differences in the total BBPS score or the adequate rate of bowel preparation between the two groups, the BBPS score of the right-side colon was significantly higher in the 3-SP group (2.37 +/- 0.54 vs 2.21 +/- 0.78; P = 0.04). Moreover, the use of simethicone significantly reduced bubbles in all colon segments (P < 0.001). The mean withdrawal time was significantly shorter in the 3-PS group (8.8 +/- 3.4 vs 9.6 +/- 2.3; P = 0.02). Furthermore, significantly more proximal adenomas were detected in the 3-PS group (53.6% vs 45.7%; P = 0.03). In addition, the proportions of patients with nausea and bloating were significantly lower in the 3-SP group (P < 0.01 for both). More patients in the 3-PS group expressed willingness to repeat the bowel preparation (87.7% vs 76.6%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION Three-liter PEG shows satisfactory bowel cleansing despite the decrease in dosage, and addition of simethicone with better bubble elimination and enhanced patient acceptance offers excellent potential impact on the detection of proximal adenomas in Chinese patients.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available