4.6 Article

Factors Affecting Detoxification of Softwood Enzymatic Hydrolysates Using Sodium Dithionite

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr9050887

Keywords

lignocellulose biorefining; conditioning; detoxification; cellulosic ethanol; inhibitors; sodium dithionite

Funding

  1. Swedish Energy Agency [P41285-1, P47516-1]
  2. Kempe Foundations
  3. Bio4Energy research environment
  4. Swedish Energy Agency (SEA) [P41285-1] Funding Source: Swedish Energy Agency (SEA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conditioning lignocellulosic hydrolysates with sulfur oxyanions, such as dithionite, is an effective method to improve fermentability by counteracting inhibitory by-products. Optimal conditions include treatment at pH 5.5 or 8.5, around 75°C, and using intermediate dithionite dosage.
Conditioning of lignocellulosic hydrolysates with sulfur oxyanions, such as dithionite, is one of the most potent methods to improve the fermentability by counteracting effects of inhibitory by-products generated during hydrothermal pretreatment under acidic conditions. The effects of pH, treatment temperature, and dithionite dosage were explored in experiments with softwood hydrolysates, sodium dithionite, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast. Treatments with dithionite at pH 5.5 or 8.5 gave similar results with regard to ethanol productivity and yield on initial glucose, and both were always at least similar to 20% higher than for treatment at pH 2.5. Experiments in the dithionite concentration range 5.0-12.5 mM and the temperature range 23-110 degrees C indicated that treatment at around 75 degrees C and using intermediate dithionite dosage was the best option (p <= 0.05). The investigation indicates that selection of the optimal temperature and dithionite dosage offers great benefits for the efficient fermentation of hydrolysates from lignin-rich biomass, such as softwood residues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available