4.6 Article

Multi-Objective Nonlinear Programming Model for Reducing Octane Number Loss in Gasoline Refining Process Based on Data Mining Technology

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr9040721

Keywords

FCC; RON; grey relational analysis; nonlinear regression; multi-objective nonlinear optimization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11971433]
  2. First Class Discipline of Zhejiang-A [1020JYN4120004G-091]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education [Y202045232]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new systematic method was proposed to determine an optimal operation scheme for minimizing RON loss and operational risks. Through data collection, dimensionality reduction, and multiple nonlinear regression, a multi-objective nonlinear optimization model was established with the objective of maximizing the reduction in RON loss and minimizing operational risks.
To simultaneously reduce automobile exhaust pollution to the environment and satisfy the demand for high-quality gasoline, the treatment of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) gasoline is urgently needed to minimize octane number (RON) loss. We presented a new systematic method for determining an optimal operation scheme for minimising RON loss and operational risks. Firstly, many data were collected and preprocessed. Then, grey correlative degree analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were used to reduce the dimensionality, and the major variables with representativeness and independence were selected from the 367 variables. Then, the RON and sulfur (S) content were predicted by multiple nonlinear regression. A multi-objective nonlinear optimization model was established with the maximum reduction in RON loss and minimum operational risk as the objective function. Finally, the optimal operation scheme of the operating variable corresponding to the sample with a RON loss reduction greater than 30% in 325 samples was solved in Python.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available