4.6 Review

Energy Metabolism in IDH1 Wild-Type and IDH1-Mutated Glioblastoma Stem Cells: A Novel Target for Therapy?

Journal

CELLS
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10030705

Keywords

glioblastoma stem cells; IDH1-mutation; energy metabolism

Categories

Funding

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [UVA 2014-6839, UVA 2016.1-10460]
  2. IVY Interreg Fellowship
  3. Slovenian Research Agency [J3-2526, Z3-1870]
  4. Fondation pour la Recherche Nuovo-Soldati 2019

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer cells in primary brain tumors, especially glioblastoma, utilize different pathways for ATP production, leading to varying levels of ROS generation. Glioblastoma stem cells in hypoxic niches mainly rely on oxidative phosphorylation for ATP and ROS production, while differentiated cells primarily use glycolysis. Therapeutic inhibition of both glycolysis and OXPHOS is not effective due to unwanted side effects and inhibition of the anti-cancer effects of ROS. Targeting GSCs by disrupting their hypoxic niches to induce differentiation is suggested to enhance their sensitivity to radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Cancer is a redox disease. Low levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are beneficial for cells and have anti-cancer effects. ROS are produced in the mitochondria during ATP production by oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). In the present review, we describe ATP production in primary brain tumors, glioblastoma, in relation to ROS production. Differentiated glioblastoma cells mainly use glycolysis for ATP production (aerobic glycolysis) without ROS production, whereas glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) in hypoxic periarteriolar niches use OXPHOS for ATP and ROS production, which is modest because of the hypoxia and quiescence of GSCs. In a significant proportion of glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) is mutated, causing metabolic rewiring, and all cancer cells use OXPHOS for ATP and ROS production. Systemic therapeutic inhibition of glycolysis is not an option as clinical trials have shown ineffectiveness or unwanted side effects. We argue that systemic therapeutic inhibition of OXPHOS is not an option either because the anti-cancer effects of ROS production in healthy cells is inhibited as well. Therefore, we advocate to remove GSCs out of their hypoxic niches by the inhibition of their binding to niches to enable their differentiation and thus increase their sensitivity to radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available