4.6 Article

MRCKα Is Dispensable for Breast Cancer Development in the MMTV-PyMT Model

Journal

CELLS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10040942

Keywords

MRCK; breast cancer; invasion

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union [703589]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [703589] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MRCK alpha is highly amplified in human breast cancer but its in vivo function remains unclear. Deletion of MRCK alpha did not affect tumor development in mouse models or migration of cancer cells, suggesting limited functional importance despite its potential as a prognostic marker in breast cancer.
MRCK alpha is a ubiquitously expressed serine/threonine kinase involved in cell contraction and F-actin turnover, which is highly amplified in human breast cancer and part of a gene expression signature for bad prognosis. Nothing is known about the in vivo function of MRCK alpha. To explore MRCK alpha function in development and in breast cancer, we generated mice lacking a functional MRCK alpha gene. Mice were born close to the Mendelian ratio and showed no obvious phenotype including a normal mammary gland formation. Assessing breast cancer development using the transgenic MMTV-PyMT mouse model, loss of MRCK alpha did not affect tumor onset, tumor growth and metastasis formation. Deleting MRCK alpha and its related family member MRCK beta in two triple-negative breast cancer cell lines resulted in reduced invasion of MDA-MB-231 cells, but did not affect migration of 4T1 cells. Further genomic analysis of human breast cancers revealed that MRCK alpha is frequently co-amplified with the oncogenes ARID4B and AKT3 which might contribute to the prognostic value of MRCK alpha expression. Collectively, these data suggest that MRCK alpha might be a prognostic marker for breast cancer, but probably of limited functional importance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available