4.6 Review

Liquid Biopsy for Small Cell Lung Cancer either De Novo or Transformed: Systematic Review of Different Applications and Meta-Analysis

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092265

Keywords

circulating tumor cells; CTCs; circulating tumor DNA; ctDNA; histologic transformation; liquid biopsy; small cell lung cancer; transformed SCLC

Categories

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro grant AIRC 5 x mille [51000]
  2. Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology, AIRC Investigator Grant [20685, 16788]
  3. AIRC Special Program 5 per mille metastases [21091]
  4. IANG-CRC grant from Fondazione Regionale Ricerca Biomedica (FRRB) of Regione Lombardia
  5. Fondazione Oncologia Niguarda Onlus, grant Terapia Molecolare dei Tumori
  6. grant Studies to Develop Therapies Against Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), shows potential clinical utility for disease monitoring and genomic profiling in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), while the use of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is hindered by data heterogeneity, lack of agreed cut-offs, and cost considerations. Further studies are needed to explore the full clinical roles of liquid biopsy in SCLC management, both in de novo and transformed cases.
Simple Summary Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor, which can occur either de novo or from the histologic transformation of non-small cell lung cancer. Liquid biopsy has demonstrated its capability to detect, characterize and monitor different cancers. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the potential added value of liquid biopsy, in terms of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs), in the management of SCLC, either de novo or transformed. We found ctDNA analysis as the most valuable and feasible technology to be integrated into clinical for disease monitoring (response, relapse, transformation) or for genomic profiling of SCLC, with a potential use also for prognostic stratification. CTCs hold a strong prognostic significance, as confirmed by our meta-analysis (even if potentially biased), but the heterogeneity of available data, the lack of agreed cut-offs, and the less affordable technology make CTCs more difficult to be integrated into present clinical practice. Background: The potential added value of liquid biopsy (LB) is not well determined in the case of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), an aggressive tumor that can occur either de novo or from the histologic transformation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A systematic review of studies adopting LB in patients with SCLC have been performed to assess the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Results: After a screening of 728 records, 62 studies (32 evaluating CTCs, 27 ctDNA, and 3 both) met predetermined eligibility criteria. Only four studies evaluated LB in the diagnostic setting for SCLC, while its prognostic significance was evaluated in 38 studies and prominently supported by both ctDNA and CTCs. A meta-analysis of 11 studies as for CTCs enumeration showed an HR for overall survival of 2.63 (1.71-4.05), with a potential publication bias. The feasibility of tumor genomic profiling and the predictive role of LB in terms of response/resistance to chemotherapy was assessed in 11 and 24 studies, respectively, with greater consistency for those regarding ctDNA. Intriguingly, several case reports suggest that LB can indirectly capture the transition to SCLC in NSCLC treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Conclusions: While dedicated trials are needed, LB holds potential clinical roles in both de novo and transformed SCLC. CtDNA analysis appears the most valuable and practicable tool for both disease monitoring and genomic profiling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available