4.7 Review

Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Early Pregnancy: What Is the Evidence?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061257

Keywords

pregnancy; gestational diabetes mellitus; early screening; diabetes

Funding

  1. Fundamenteel Klinisch Navorserschap FWO Vlaanderen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing worldwide, and screening and treatment in early pregnancy still lack consensus. Observational studies show varying results in detecting GDM early, with ongoing large RCTs to determine appropriate strategies and benefits. There is also limited evidence on the sensitivity of HbA1c in early pregnancy, requiring further research.
The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing worldwide. This has a significant effect on the health of the mother and offspring. There is no doubt that screening for GDM between 24 and 28 weeks is important to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, there is no consensus about diagnosis and treatment of GDM in early pregnancy. In this narrative review on the current evidence on screening for GDM in early pregnancy, we included 37 cohort studies and eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Observational studies have shown that a high proportion (15-70%) of women with GDM can be detected early in pregnancy depending on the setting, criteria used and screening strategy. Data from observational studies on the potential benefit of screening and treatment of GDM in early pregnancy show conflicting results. In addition, there is substantial heterogeneity in age and BMI across the different study populations. Smaller RCTs could not show benefit but several large RCTs are ongoing. RCTs are also necessary to determine the appropriate cut-off for HbA1c in pregnancy as there is limited evidence showing that an HbA1c >= 6.5% has a low sensitivity to detect overt diabetes in early pregnancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available