4.7 Article

A Phenome-Wide Association Study (PheWAS) of COVID-19 Outcomes by Race Using the Electronic Health Records Data in Michigan Medicine

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071351

Keywords

biobank; health disparities; EHR; phenome; odds ratio; risk profile

Funding

  1. University of Michigan Precision Health Initiative
  2. University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
  3. Michigan Institute of Data Science
  4. National Science Foundation [DMS 1712933]
  5. National Institutes of Health [P30 CA 046592-30-S3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified pre-existing conditions associated with COVID-19 outcomes, such as hospitalization, ICU admission, and mortality. It also highlighted the importance of targeted screening for specific vulnerable populations and revealed differences in disease prognosis among different racial groups.
Background: We performed a phenome-wide association study to identify pre-existing conditions related to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prognosis across the medical phenome and how they vary by race. Methods: The study is comprised of 53,853 patients who were tested/diagnosed for COVID-19 between 10 March and 2 September 2020 at a large academic medical center. Results: Pre-existing conditions strongly associated with hospitalization were renal failure, pulmonary heart disease, and respiratory failure. Hematopoietic conditions were associated with intensive care unit (ICU) admission/mortality and mental disorders were associated with mortality in non-Hispanic Whites. Circulatory system and genitourinary conditions were associated with ICU admission/mortality in non-Hispanic Blacks. Conclusions: Understanding pre-existing clinical diagnoses related to COVID-19 outcomes informs the need for targeted screening to support specific vulnerable populations to improve disease prevention and healthcare delivery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available