4.7 Review

Delivery technologies for T cell gene editing: Applications in cancer immunotherapy

Journal

EBIOMEDICINE
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103354

Keywords

Adoptive cell therapy; Immunotherapy; Gene editing; Non-viral delivery

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director's New Innovator Award [DP2 TR002776]
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award at the Scientific Interface (CASI)
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01CA241661, R37CA244911, R01DK123049, UL1TR001878]
  4. Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics (ITMAT) Transdisciplinary Program in Translational Medicine and Therapeutics
  5. Tau Beta Pi Graduate Research Fellowship
  6. NIH Training in HIV Pathogenesis T32 Program [T32 AI007632]
  7. Littlejohn Undergraduate Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic engineering has transformed cancer immunotherapy by modifying primary T cells to enhance their therapeutic potential, with studies and clinical trials supporting the effectiveness of this approach.
While initial approaches to adoptive T cell therapy relied on the identification and expansion of rare tumour-reactive T cells, genetic engineering has transformed cancer immunotherapy by enabling the modification of primary T cells to increase their therapeutic potential. Specifically, gene editing technologies have been utilized to create T cell populations with improved responses to antigens, lower rates of exhaustion, and potential for use in allogeneic applications. In this review, we provide an overview of T cell therapy gene editing strategies and the delivery technologies utilized to genetically engineer T cells. We also discuss recent investigations and clinical trials that have utilized gene editing to enhance the efficacy of T cells and broaden the application of cancer immunotherapies. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available