4.8 Article

The evolution of pelvic limb muscle moment arms in bird-line archosaurs

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe2778

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sam and Doris Welles Fund (University of California)
  2. NERC [NE/K004751/1]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [695517]
  4. NERC [NE/K004751/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through studying the three-dimensional musculoskeletal models of bird-line archosaurs, the evolution of muscle moment arms during the transition from dinosaurs to birds was quantified. Results indicate a shift in locomotion from hip-based to knee-based mechanisms and reveal unexpected ancestral specializations in early dinosaurs.
Bipedal locomotion evolved along the archosaurian lineage to birds, shifting from hip-based to knee-based mechanisms. However, the roles of individual muscles in these changes and their evolutionary timings remain obscure. Using 13 three-dimensional musculoskeletal models of the hindlimbs of bird-line archosaurs, we quantify how the moment arms (i.e., leverages) of 35 locomotor muscles evolved. Our results support two hypotheses: From early theropod dinosaurs to birds, knee flexors' moment arms decreased relative to knee extensors', and medial long-axis rotator moment arms for the hip increased (trading off with decreased hip abductor moment arms). Our results reveal how, from the Triassic Period, bipedal theropod dinosaurs gradually modified their hindlimb form and function, shifting more from hip-based to knee-based locomotion and hip-abductor to hip-rotator balancing mechanisms inherited by birds. Yet, we also discover unexpected ancestral specializations in larger Jurassic theropods, lost later in the bird-line, complicating the paradigm of gradual transformation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available